![]() Margaret Butcher |
This is an intriguing story and Derek and I argued as to who should tell it and guess who won! First we will talk about the seed that appeared in May 1984 named Neoregelia tigrina. Keith Bradtberg grew the seed and we got two main types , one we called 'Spotted Tiger' and the other 'Purple Tiger'. They were obviously of hybrid origin although the identity of either parent is in doubt. In the early 1980's no one really knew what Neoregelia tigrina looked like. In fact we bought it at the Orange County Bromeliad Show in California in 1982 as Neoregelia albiflora. At about the same time it was imported to Australia from the USA as Neoregelia 'Marnier-Lapostolle'
In the BSI Journal 1983 page 192 Harry Luther pointed out that all US forms of Neoregelia albiflora were really Neoregelia tigrina. No mention was made of Neoregelia 'Marnier-Lapostolle' but if we refer to the BS Bulletin 1970 page 128 we will find the following; This information suggests that this plant could easily have been called Neoregelia 'Marnier-Lapostolle' but is clearly a Neoregelia tigrina. Confusion is also caused by a form of Neoregelia ampullacea being called 'Tigrina' (see BCR page 325) which bears no relationship to the species Neoregelia tigrina. Yet more confusion was caused by using the name N. 'Marnier-Lapostolle' because there is a recognised hybrid of this name from (ampullacea x zonata) (see BCR page 262) Auntie Margaret |
|
Neo. tigrina |
Neo. 'Marnier-Lapostolle' |
Neo. 'Purple Tiger' |
Neo. 'Spotted Tiger' |
Dear Auntie:
Another remark from an old hybridizer in California... Years ago we had
plants named Ampullacea Var. tigrina, it was the same size but with much
darker banding. According to my old International check list of hybrids
Marnier Lapostelle is a registered hybrid of ampullacea and Zonata.
When you grow seeds from the seed fund you are apt to get anything, this
is even true if you are attempting new hybrids. It is real important
that the two parents are species to get close to the same result,
otherwise you end up with a lot of junk. Often one of the junk plants
is interesting and it gets propagated and given a name and a real mess
ensues. Hybridizer Hummel did this as he was in the plant business and
it took years to come up with something special. Then, after a show
everyone wanted one, and he only had one. Thus the reluctance to let out
the parents names. I have made over 41 crosses in my eight years of
growing and only one is of note so far.
Much of the problem of identification has to do with culture. Neo's if
starved for food turn spectacular colors, and compact leaves. Neos
grown with fertilizer are completely different. I remember the look on
Pamela Lever's face when she saw how I grew plants in the greenhouses
she now owns. No fertilizer,lots of light and humidity, and heat...
well enough... Look forward to SF in the year 2000.
Bruce Thom
'Auntie Margaret'
The photo of Neo. 'Spotted Tiger' looks surprisingly like a lot of the
offspring from hybrids made with Neo. sarmentosa though I cannot be
certain of parentage I have perhaps 8 or 10 distinct hybrids with Neo.
sarmentosa ,both my own and those by various hybridizers, and all have
the same distinct leaf tips.
But as with any of these things it's just "a shot in the dark"
Geoff Johnson
Photo Credits:
Neo. tigrina - BS Bulletin 1970
Neo. 'Marnier-Lapostolle' - Derek Butcher
Neo. 'Purple Tiger' - Derek Butcher
Neo. 'Spotted Tiger' - Derek Butcher